The Pros and Cons of Sober Living Houses

andreagrossioSober living

Attendance is required for all house meetings and support group meetings. To continue staying, each resident has to fulfill all household duties, including rent. Sober living and halfway homes both require sobriety but are distinct in a few ways. There is some light at the end of the tunnel, though, just in the fact that you never have a complete vacancy.

While completing a substance abuse rehab program before moving in may not be required, it can help individuals to stay sober. However, if residents are willing to remain sober, follow all house rules, and guarantee medical stability, they should feel free to apply. Recovery and sober living homes can empower individuals to get the help they need, and the aftercare required to complete rehabilitation.

Sober Living Eligibility Requirements

Someone’s family and friends could become a barrier to recovery, or may even trigger relapse. Conversely, having a change of scenery and being safely away from temptation can facilitate faster healing. Sober living houses can foster peer encouragement, camaraderie, character development, and accountability in residents.

sober living housing

Sober living houses (SLHs) are alcohol and drug free living environments that offer peer support for recovery outside the context of treatment. The “true” social model residence – one managed by its residents without staff and with no more than a resident manager – now had competition. While all these facilities nominally operated alcohol/drug free settings, house rules and conditions regarding strict sobriety varied based on special needs of residents who had other problems in addition to alcohol. While funding for state prisons has skyrocketed, funding for treatment programs of all varieties has decreased. Reductions began under President Reagan, who made deep cuts that led to instability at the state and local level.

How Sober Living Homes Differ From Halfway Houses

Such a model reflected the social model emphasis on empowerment of the residents rather than large power imbalances between managers and residences. As Schonlau put it, “a good manager manages the residency but not the residents” (Schonlau, 1990, p.73). Permanent house managers (people with extensive recovery experience) managed the place, while current residents managed conduct and operations. In addition to custodial care in state psychiatric hospitals, many persons with alcohol and drug problems were housed in local jails (drunk tanks) and county work farms that were part of local jail systems.